This was the third paper I reviewed for the predatory publisher Scientific Research Publishing's Open Journal of Statistics.
The manuscript was a simulation study of a new computational method.
It was the first paper I had reviewed in three years, as I had been
otherwise swamped in coursework. You can see that I still wasn't clear
on the differences of the roles of copy-editor and reviewer by the
extensive writing feedback I gave. By word count, the review was a third
as long as the manuscript itself.
Statistical education, publishing, sports analytics, and game theory - everything that makes math useful in real life. Now carbon negative!
Featured post
Textbook: Writing for Statistics and Data Science
If you are looking for my textbook Writing for Statistics and Data Science here it is for free in the Open Educational Resource Commons. Wri...
Friday, 28 September 2018
Wednesday, 26 September 2018
Two career failure stories
This semester, I am teaching a course in career planning in statistics. No such course existed when I was an undergrad, so a lot of the planned course material was learned from experience. I opened the semester with some 'failure stories' of trying to start a career with a BSc in Math. Here are some of my failures:
Friday, 21 September 2018
Open Reviews 2 - Open Journal of Statistics 2012
These were the first two papers I reviewed for Scientific Research Publishing's Open Journal of Statistics, back in 2012. The first one is 'An Exceptional Generalization of the Poisson Distribution', and the second one was 'A Proposed Statistical Method to Explore Quality of Quantitative Data'.
Labels:
open reviews,
publishing,
reviews,
stats,
writing
Tuesday, 18 September 2018
Open Reviews 1 - Two Meta-Psychology Papers
This is the first post of several in which I publish the peer reviews I have previously given to journals.
There are a few reasons for doing this, but the main one is purely mercenary: I want to get more return for the effort I put into carefully reading and critiquing these articles.
There are a few reasons for doing this, but the main one is purely mercenary: I want to get more return for the effort I put into carefully reading and critiquing these articles.
Labels:
open reviews,
publishing,
reviews,
stats,
writing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)